Market Insights | Resources

The Influence Of Corporate Social Responsibility On Sales

Sep 15, 2023 | Shabbir Poonawala

This Blog discusses the results of a study on the influences of corporate social responsibility activities (CSRAs) on buyer motivations and sales revenue. The study focuses on two types of CSRAs: functional (related to ecological benefits) and symbolic (related to ethical and social benefits). The document highlights the two stages of the study: testing hypotheses regarding the functional and symbolic benefits groups, and conducting an exploratory analysis of the individual influences of the seven CSR types. The document also mentions the use of fixed effects models and instrumental variable regression in the analysis. The introduction provides an overview of the document and sets the context for the subsequent discussion. It highlights the significance of the topic and outlines the purpose and objectives of the research.

Let us begin by acknowledging the rapid technological developments that have led to the emergence of the metaverse, a digital world with a projected market value of $800 billion by 2024. The metaverse is expected to revolutionize the retailing industry, but there is still limited understanding of its implications from the perspectives of customers, retailers, and brands.

This Blog's aim is to address this knowledge gap by offering a new conceptualization of the metaverse, which includes four distinct dimensions: online collaboration, high consumer immersion, unique digital assets, and digital personas. They also introduce the concept of a transitory metaverse to better understand the current stage of metaverse development.

To guide future research, the authors propose 27 directions based on how the metaverse dimensions amplify three customer touchpoints in the digital experience: digital economic exchange, complex social relationships, and direct environment interaction. These touchpoints are relevant to the three main stakeholders in retailing exchanges: consumers, retailers, and brands.

DISCUSSION

The discussion section of this study is critical in unveiling the implications and limitations of the research, shedding light on its contribution to the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) literature. The study's primary contribution lies in the development and presentation of a comprehensive typology of CSRA (Corporate Social Responsibility Activities), which includes the identification of four additional types previously not extensively explored. This typology is likely to provide a valuable framework for future research and assist businesses in tailoring their CSR strategies to align with specific CSRAs.

Another significant aspect of the study is its investigation into the price elasticities of different CSR types. By examining how sensitive consumer demand is to changes in CSR-related pricing, the study offers insights into consumer behavior and preferences concerning socially responsible products or services. Additionally, the research delves into the influence of retailer promotion activities on sales revenue, shedding light on how marketing efforts can impact the success of CSR initiatives and encourage businesses to develop more effective promotional strategies.

Throughout the discussion, the study emphasizes the importance of buyer benefits as key motivators for CSRA purchases. This insight is invaluable for businesses looking to integrate CSR practices into their operations. By highlighting the correlation between customer benefits and successful CSR initiatives, the study underscores the need for businesses to align their social responsibilities with what their target audience values and appreciates. Such alignment can foster stronger customer loyalty, and positive brand perception, and potentially lead to increased market share.

Despite its significant contributions, the study also acknowledges certain limitations that warrant consideration. One of the limitations is the reliance on survey data, which may introduce response bias and limit the scope of findings. Additionally, the study recognizes that the analysis focuses on a specific geographic region or industry, which may limit the generalizability of the results. Future research could address these limitations by employing diverse data sources and expanding the study's scope to encompass a broader range of industries and regions.

In conclusion, this study adds to the CSR literature by providing a comprehensive typology of CSRAs and exploring their price elasticities and the impact of retailer promotion on sales revenue. It highlights the importance of aligning business responsibilities with customer benefits to ensure successful CSRA purchases. While it presents valuable insights, it acknowledges limitations that can guide future research endeavors for a deeper understanding of CSR's influence on consumer behavior and business performance. Ultimately, this research contributes to the broader goal of fostering socially responsible business practices and sustainable consumer choices. 

The discussion section focuses on the implications and limitations of the study. It highlights the contribution of the research to the CSR literature by presenting a comprehensive typology of CSRAs, including four additional types. The study also investigates the price elasticities of the different CSR types and examines the influence of retailer promotion activities on sales revenue. The discussion notes the importance of buyer benefits as motivators for CSRA purchases and emphasizes the alignment of business responsibilities with customer benefits.

DETAILED INTERPRETATION

The first part of the context discusses the issue of endogeneity, which occurs when variables that are not included in a model are correlated with the variables that are included. In this case, the unavailable variables (such as reputation or shelf space) are correlated with the included variable (price), which is indirectly affected by related promotions and featured advertisements 1. The researchers used four data sources for their research: a survey to identify functional and symbolic benefit groups, universal product codes (UPCs) for products with CSRAs, transaction data from 10 stores, and demographic data on respondents' age, income, and education distribution 1.

The second part of the context focuses on the hypothesis related to eco-materials. It explains that certain materials used in products can produce unwanted emissions and residuals, which can lead to ecological imbalance and pollution. In contrast, eco-materials are biodegradable, compostable, and made from recycled raw ingredients. The context also mentions eco-packaging, which uses less material, renewable and recyclable materials, and avoids single-usage packages. Eco-process refers to sustainable agriculture and manufacturing processes that reduce harmful emissions. The context highlights the importance of understanding the different types of CSRA (Corporate Social Responsibility Appeals) and their impact 2.

The third part of the context presents the results of the research in two stages. The first stage involves testing hypotheses related to CSRA functional and symbolic benefit groups, while the second stage involves an exploratory analysis of the influences of the seven CSRA types. The researchers used fixed effects models to estimate the coefficients for lagged price promotion and featured advertisements. The results are presented in Table 1, which shows parameter estimates for each CSRA variable and their comparisons to non-CSRA products 3.

The fourth part of the context discusses the concept of metaverses and their relevance to marketers. Metaverses are virtual reality spaces where users can interact with each other and digital content. There are various metaverses available, each with different features and emphases. Marketers need to understand the features of each metaverse and the demographics of consumers participating in each in order to choose the most suitable one for their target audience. In some cases, marketers may choose to develop their own metaverse if existing options do not meet their objectives 4.

The fifth part of the context reflects on the limitations and implications for future research. The study contributes to the CSR literature by presenting a CSRA typology and investigating the effects of CSR activities on firm performance. The study also suggests potential areas for future research, such as investigating customer market baskets, cross-affinity effects, and interaction effects across CSRA types and product categories. Additionally, the study highlights the importance of considering online shopping and replicating the research to extend its generalizability

METHODOLOGY

The methodology used in the study involved the analysis of four data sources. The first source was a survey that identified the functional and symbolic benefit groups of CSRAs. The second source consisted of universal product codes (UPCs) for products with CSRAs, which were collected by the lead researcher through inventory examination in a large store of a U.S. grocery chain. A total of 2,046 unique UPCs with CSRAs were identified. These two data sources were then merged with a third data source obtained from the grocery chain, comprising 25 months of transaction data from 10 stores. The individual transactions were converted into weekly aggregates for each UPC, which is appropriate for grocery industry research. The respondents' demographic information, such as age, income, and education distribution, was also collected.

The methodology also addressed potential issues such as multicollinearity and the robustness of the results. The analysis checked for multicollinearity by examining the variance inflation factor (VIF) values, which indicated no collinearity issue. The robustness of the results was tested by analyzing the data using instrumental-variable regression with multiple levels of fixed effects. The results showed that the findings were robust.

In conclusion, the document provides a comprehensive analysis of the influences of CSRAs on buyer motivations and the relative effectiveness of different types of CSRAs. The study highlights the importance of aligning the social responsibilities of businesses with the benefits offered to shoppers, which can positively impact firm performance. The methodology used in the study involved the analysis of multiple data sources and employed various statistical techniques to test hypotheses and explore the individual influences of CSRAs. The findings contribute to the CSR literature and provide insights for future research in this domain.

The study employs a quantitative approach to analyze the data. The researchers estimate equations using fixed effects models to examine the relationships between the different CSRA variables and sales revenue. They also use instrumental variable regression to test the robustness of the results. Multiple data sources are utilized, including surveys to identify the functional and symbolic benefit groups, universal product codes (UPCs) to track products with CSRAs, and transaction data from grocery stores. The data are aggregated on a weekly basis for analysis.

RESEARCH IDEOLOGY

From the provided context, there are several new ideas and research contributions that can be derived:

CSRA Typology: The study introduces a new typology called CSRA (Corporate Social Responsibility Appeals) that expands the scope of CSR appeals in the retailing industry. It includes four additional types of CSRAs (Eco-packaging, Eco-processing, Eco-materials, and Cruelty-free) and organizes them into Functional and Symbolic benefit groups. This typology provides a framework for understanding and categorizing different CSR appeals in the retail sector 1.

Unit of Analysis: The study extends the CSR literature by using the individual product as the unit of analysis. It compares CSRA products to non-CSRA products, investigates the price elasticities of different CSRA types, and explores the performance of CSRA products in different product category groups (Virtue or Vice). This approach provides insights into the effects of CSR activities on sales performance at product level 1.

Retailer Promotion Activities: The study examines how retailer promotion activities influence the sales revenue of CSRA products. By investigating the impact of promotions on the sales performance of CSRA products, the research sheds light on the role of marketing and promotional strategies in driving consumer behavior and purchase decisions in the context of CSR 1.

Replication and Generalizability: The study highlights the need for future research to replicate the findings to extend the generalizability of the results. Replication studies can further validate the findings and provide a broader understanding of the relationships between CSRA types, product categories, and consumer behavior. Additionally, future research can explore customer market baskets, cross-affinity effects, and interaction effects across different CSRA types and product categories 1.

Online Shopping and CSR: The study suggests that future research should explore the impact of CSR appeals in online shopping settings. Online modes of shopping have unique characteristics that may influence consumer behavior and the effectiveness of CSR appeals. Factors such as the availability of sorting products by CSRAs and the readability of CSRA indicators on product labels can affect consumer decision-making in online shopping environments. Therefore, investigating CSR in the context of online shopping is an essential area for future research 1.

Metaverse and Retailing: The second part of the context introduces the concept of the metaverse and its potential impact on retailing. The authors highlight that the metaverse, with its dimensions of online collaboration, high consumer immersion, unique digital assets, and digital personas, is expected to reshape retailing in the digital world. However, there is limited understanding of the metaverse from a customer, retailer, or brand perspective. The authors propose a new conceptualization of the metaverse and suggest 27 directions for future research to explore its implications for retailing 3.

Overall, these ideas and research contributions provide valuable insights into the relationship between CSR appeals and consumer behavior in the retail sector, as well as the potential impact of the metaverse on the future of retailing. They open up avenues for further research and exploration in these areas. 

RESULT

The study presents the parameter estimates for the equations used in the analysis. The coefficients for lagged price promotion and featured advertisements are reported as significant (β1 = 0.838, p < 0.05) and (γ1 = 0.852, p < 0.05) respectively. The document also mentions the positive direct effects of functional CSRAs on sales revenue, with the exception of certain interactions with retail promotions. On the other hand, the results for symbolic CSRAs show a mix of negative and positive effects.

The provided document contains information related to a research study on consumer buying behavior and the impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Appeals (CSRAs) on sales revenue. The document highlights the data sources used for the research, the statistical analysis techniques employed, and the results obtained. It also discusses the different types of CSRAs and their effects on buyer motivation and sales revenue. Additionally, the document addresses the potential issues of multicollinearity and provides insights into the interpretation of the results.

The document begins by mentioning the concept of "endogeneity" (1). Endogeneity refers to a situation where variables that are not included in the analysis are correlated with the included variables, leading to biased estimates. In this context, the document suggests that variables such as reputation or shelf space may be correlated with price, which is indirectly affected by related promotions and featured advertisements. This highlights the need to consider the potential impact of these variables when analyzing the effects of CSRAs on sales revenue.

The research study utilizes four data sources: a survey to identify the functional and symbolic benefit groups, universal product codes (UPCs) for products with CSRAs, transaction data from a grocery chain, and demographic information of the respondents (1). These data sources allow for a comprehensive analysis of the impact of CSRAs on buyer motivations and sales revenue.

The document mentions the use of a fixed effects model to estimate the parameters of the equations (1). This modeling technique helps control for unobserved heterogeneity and provides more accurate estimates of the relationships between variables. The coefficients for lagged price promotion and featured advertisements are reported to be statistically significant (1). This suggests that these factors have a significant impact on sales revenue and need to be considered when analyzing the effects of CSRAs.

The first stage of the analysis focuses on testing the hypotheses related to the functional and symbolic benefit groups of CSRAs (2). The results of this stage are presented in Table 1, which shows the parameter estimates of the equations (1). The interpretation of the coefficients is twofold: they indicate comparisons of each CSRA variable to non-CSRA products, and they provide insights into the effects of CSRAs on sales revenue. The document mentions specific CSRA types such as Organic, CRM, and Cruelty-free, and their respective effects on sales revenue (3). These results are consistent with previous studies on the sales of organic products and highlight the importance of considering different types of CSRAs when analyzing their impact on buyer behavior.

The document also addresses potential issues such as multicollinearity and the robustness of the results (3). The absence of high variance inflation factor (VIF) values suggests that there is no collinearity issue in the analysis. Furthermore, the use of instrumental-variable regression with multiple levels of fixed effects helps ensure the robustness of the results.

In the second stage of the analysis, the researchers examine the individual influences of the seven CSRA types on sales revenue (2). The results of this exploratory analysis are presented in Table 3, which shows the effects of each CSRA type on sales revenue. The document highlights the different patterns observed for the functional and symbolic benefit groups. For example, the functional CSRA types generally have positive direct effects on sales revenue but negative effects when interacting with retail promotions. On the other hand, the symbolic CSRA types have a mix of negative and positive effects (4).

The document provides further insights into the individual CSRA types, such as the impact of Eco-materials, Eco-packaging, and Eco-process on ecological balance and pollution (4). It also discusses the appeal of locally grown food and the importance of sustainable agriculture and manufacturing processes. These insights highlight the broader implications of CSRAs beyond sales revenue and emphasize the importance of considering sustainability and environmental factors in consumer buying behavior.

In conclusion, the document reviewed and interpreted provides valuable insights into the impact of CSRAs on buyer motivations and sales revenue. It highlights the need to consider endogeneity, utilize appropriate statistical techniques, and examine the effects of different types of CSRAs. The results of the analysis suggest that CSRAs have a significant impact on sales revenue, and their effects vary depending on the type of CSRAs. These findings contribute to the existing literature on CSRAs and provide practical implications for businesses in terms of marketing and product strategies.

CONCLUSION

The conclusion of the document suggests that the social responsibilities of businesses, including their economic responsibilities, can align with the benefits offered to shoppers at the product level, thereby positively impacting firm performance. The study found direct and moderated effects from the corporate social responsibility activities of producers and retailers on the sales performance (revenue) of products with corporate social responsibility attributes (CSRAs). These effects occur because the benefits to buyers are the essential motivators for CSRA purchases. The study also explored the individual influences of seven types of CSRAs on buyer motivations and the relative effectiveness of these CSRAs. The results showed that different types of CSRAs have varying effects on sales revenue, with some types having positive direct effects and others having mixed effects. The study makes several contributions to the CSR literature, including the presentation of a CSRA typology, the investigation of price elasticities of different CSRAs, and the examination of how retailer promotion activities influence the sales revenue of CSRA products. The document also highlights some limitations of the study and suggests directions for future research.

The study concludes that the economic responsibilities of businesses can align with the benefits offered to shoppers through CSR activities, resulting in positive firm performance. The findings highlight the significance of buyer benefits as motivators for CSRA purchases and demonstrate the direct and moderated effects of CSR activities on sales performance. The study suggests future research directions, including replication studies to extend the generalizability of the results and investigations into customer market baskets and online shopping behavior. The document concludes by emphasizing the importance of offering a variety of benefits to enhance customer satisfaction and loyalty.


I Understand

By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies.

Know More.
X